The Earshot Theorem
Feb. 22nd, 2011 09:58 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Buffy fans might remember the episode Earshot, in which a demon sting (or something) causes Buffy to develop telepathy; as a result, she learns that someone is planning a massacre at Sunnydale High. I'm thinking about that episode for two reasons: one,
gabrielleabelle runs a weekly episode poll, and this one is on "Earshot."
Two, it contains a quote I keep repeating to myself:
That's not always true, by any means. We, as humans, are very much capable of looking past our own pain and problems and drama, to see the problems other humans have and help them through -- and to see the good things that happen to others, and take joy in their joy. Empathy. It's a wonderful, wonderful thing.
But there are times when we can't, or shouldn't, focus on other people's pain. Because we are, or should be, busy with our own lives.
Sometimes I grumble and whine and put my pain out there (by posting here, or by venting to an RL friend) and I don't get the response I was hoping for. I remind myself that everyone is busy with their own pain; that a lack of response doesn't necessarily mean people don't care; it might just mean they have too many things to think about closer to home.
And sometimes my friends grumble and whine and express their pain and I don't have the energy to respond the way I'd like to. I don't always have the capacity to read and reply, or to listen and respond in an engaged way. That doesn't necessarily make me a bad friend or a bad person; sometimes it means I'm stretched too thin just taking care of myself.
On the good days, of course, we rise above that. We help each other through the bad times and take mutual joy in the good times.
On the bad days, remember the Earshot Theorem. It might keep you from adding another layer of misery on top of what's already there.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Two, it contains a quote I keep repeating to myself:
"Everyone is ignoring your pain, because they're too busy with their own."
That's not always true, by any means. We, as humans, are very much capable of looking past our own pain and problems and drama, to see the problems other humans have and help them through -- and to see the good things that happen to others, and take joy in their joy. Empathy. It's a wonderful, wonderful thing.
But there are times when we can't, or shouldn't, focus on other people's pain. Because we are, or should be, busy with our own lives.
Sometimes I grumble and whine and put my pain out there (by posting here, or by venting to an RL friend) and I don't get the response I was hoping for. I remind myself that everyone is busy with their own pain; that a lack of response doesn't necessarily mean people don't care; it might just mean they have too many things to think about closer to home.
And sometimes my friends grumble and whine and express their pain and I don't have the energy to respond the way I'd like to. I don't always have the capacity to read and reply, or to listen and respond in an engaged way. That doesn't necessarily make me a bad friend or a bad person; sometimes it means I'm stretched too thin just taking care of myself.
On the good days, of course, we rise above that. We help each other through the bad times and take mutual joy in the good times.
On the bad days, remember the Earshot Theorem. It might keep you from adding another layer of misery on top of what's already there.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 03:25 pm (UTC)(and know I am reading everything you write on this thing, even if I can't find the words every time. So, it's true! *grin*)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 05:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 03:37 pm (UTC)On the good days, of course, we rise above that. We help each other through the bad times and take mutual joy in the good times.
On the bad days, I remind myself that there is someone out there, with their own pain. My job's to pause, take another look, and say, 'That don't look like my brother. But maybe he is.'
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 05:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 03:46 pm (UTC)Your take is a bit more optimistic/friendly, and so totally you. *hugs* Like Kit, I'm always reading and think about what you say, even if I have no response, or a different one from what you're looking for.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 05:09 pm (UTC)Anyway, thank you very much!
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 05:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 05:40 pm (UTC)ILU even if you're curmudgeony!
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 05:44 pm (UTC)ILU too!! *snugs*
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 04:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 05:09 pm (UTC)*hugs back*
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 10:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 11:10 pm (UTC)I thought you might.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-22 11:36 pm (UTC)Yes.
Absolutely, hands down, true. It's not a bad thing, it's a survival tactic, and you're absolutely right that it's not a constant but the exception.
The other thing I remember here on LJ is that just because people don't respond doesn't mean they don't sympathize. They just don't know how to respond. '*hugs*' seems so trite and other times they may not know you well and feel like they're invading.
But yeah. So much agreement with this right now.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-23 12:02 am (UTC)Excellent way of putting it. Thank you for this.